Remember that the purpose of a WA is for you to demonstrate that you mastered the material in that unit by being able to identify issues and by stating (in your own words) the general rule of law applicable to each issue. A WA is not an essay exam or a discussion topic. I am fine if you list the issues and state the law applicable to each. Pretend that Kyle is your client and is sitting across your desk from you telling you his situation. As he tells you his situation, you will be identifying issues that you will need to address in order to help him. I suggest that first you just read the factset, then reread it highlighting issues, next read it again and begin drafting a list of issues, both major and minor. Finally, with each issue, state the general rule of law that will help you resolve that issue (then go on to the next issue). For example, if the issue is: “Does the federal government have the authority to regulate Kyle’s business operations?” The statement of controlling law would be: “Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution gives the federal government the power to regulate interstate commerce.” Do not restate the facts in your statement of law.
As noted in WA3, Kyle took your advice and decided not to spend the money to fight for his claim to “KFC.com” as the domain name for his new product line, Kyle’s Fine Condiments and reorganized the company as a LLC (limited liability company). Kyle, however, does want to continue the move of his business, Alabama Sunshine, to the next level of operations and he wants to complete the expansion by construct of a new store in Florala, AL. Recall that the property was owned by Sam; however, since Kyle’s business was so successful and people throughout Alabama and abutting States knew him andAlabama Sunshine, Kyle hired Angie to contact Sam, negotiate a price, and, if possible, buy Sam’s property, Kyle instructed Angie to not tell Sam that she was working for Kyle. Unfortunately, Angie realized that Sam’s property was an exceptionally good deal and bought the property for herself, not Kyle as agreed. Kyle has gotten over his anger and wants to move on with the construction of the new building on Greenacre (the Angie/Sam parcel of land).
Angie had acquired Greenacre in fee simple absolute and proposes to convey Greenacre to Kyle with a right of reverter (reversionary interest) as the location for Kyle’s new store. The proposed conveyance would be a defeasible fee (fee simple defeasible) with the condition that, should Kyle fail to construct and open his store on Greenacre within 24 months or should Kyle cease to use Greenacre as a site for his store in the future, then Greenacre would revert back to Angie or her heirs. Angie also mentions that she does not want to transfer mineral rights to Kyle.
All this sounds pretty complicated to Kyle and he is growing nervous about this deal. His knowledge is in growing, processing, and marketing produce, not real estate transactions and land transfers. Knowing that you are (successfully) completing BL 240 and have studied land-use control and real property, Kyle turns to you for counsel. He is also concerned about any other problems that he should consider in this transaction or relating to the construction of the new business location. What are the legal issues and how would you advise Kyle? Kyle also mentions that a customer of United Nutrition Associates (UNA—recall WA2) is complaining that his holiday pack did not provide the health benefits that she would expect from organically grown produce. The family has filed a complaint with the federal government and is now threatening a lawsuit. Kyle wants to know what the legal issues are and how he should respond.